António Martins-Tuválkin schreef: > I'm referencing to a book entitled: > Памятники
(etc, which translates into Памятники Музея Ізящныхъ Іскусствъ імені ІмператораАлександра III въ Москве) > I see that the the roman ordinal "third" can be encoded in a couple of different ways: > > - U+0049 U+0049 U+0049 > - U+0406 U+0406 U+0406 (considering that this old russian orthography) > - U+2162 > - U+2160 U+2160 U+2160 No. Encoded like that it may *look* like a roman three, but two of those are definitely not correct. Only U+2162 or its compatibility decomposition, U+0049 U+0049 U+0049 should be used. The other two are bad coding, just as using greek Iotas or combinations of U+2160 and U+0049 would be. Pim Blokland
