Not only is the name likely to change (based on all the issues already discussed), but it is conceivable that WG2 could decide to approve it at some other code position instead.
Indeed I will probably propose to move the character on general principles. ;-) No cheating! ;-)
It is even conceivable that WG2 could *refuse* to encode the character.
(I shouldn't think so.)
There have been precedents, where a UTC approved character met opposition in WG2, and the UTC later decided to rescind its approval in favor of maintaining
synchronization of the standards when published.
And vice versa. -- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
