Peter Kirk wrote:
> And then if (and I know it's a big if) the UTC agrees in principle to
> allow a change to these combining classes, [...]
This just isn't going to happen, so people should look elsewhere for
solutions. I don't believe UTC could make such a decision and retain any
sort of credibility. As has been discussed at length, it isn't possible to
make this kind of change now because of the deep impact it would have on
the frozen normalizations for these codepoints in deployed protocols and
software.
A solution with CGJ has been proposed, which is very general and can be
applied to this and other such situations.
Rick
