Peter Kirk wrote:
And indeed the software being used is produced by a consortium member. Perhaps the embarrassment should be more that member's, that their software is not Unicode compatible.
The member in question is a company. Companies are not embarrassed nor ashamed.
Actually, we don't need that much: there are very few strings set in other scripts, and for those, it would be quite acceptable to do the typesetting by hand - in fact, that's precisely what is done today.
whilst implementing the full standard, including all scripts... Even the ones that would be newly defined in the next version... ;-)
Eric.
