Doug Ewell wrote: Thanks for the report, I’ll forward to the Photoshop guys. By the way, the font is apparently Adobe Caslon Pro.Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin <antonio at tuvalkin dot web dot pt> wrote:The bad part of it is that the ligated characters shown (in the sencond and third examples) seem to include a long "s" instead of an "f"... > <ty_06.gif> attached for reference. More likely, the image was created in Illustrator or some such, and the glyph selected manually by the author. I did not check explicitly, but I am ready to bet a whole lot that the font does the correct thing.Substituting an unligated ſi (U+017F + U+0069) for fi (U+0066 + U+0069) makes no sense at all. If the current font doesn't contain an fi ligature (U+FB01), Photoshop should just leave the combination alone. Eric. |
- Faulty ligatures in Adobe PhotoShop Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin
- Re: Faulty ligatures in Adobe PhotoShop Doug Ewell
- RE: Faulty ligatures in Adobe PhotoSho... Eric Muller
- RE: Faulty ligatures in Adobe PhotoSho... Kent Karlsson
- Re: Faulty ligatures in Adobe PhotoShop John Hudson