John Cowan wrote: > > http://panda.com/tops-20/utf9.txt > > > > Res ipsa loquitur.
But apparently res ipsa non loquitur, because Phillipe continued: > > Are there still now platforms where storage bytes are not octets but nonets? > i.e. 9-bit based platforms? If so this proposal makes sense, but as a local > optimization for these platforms. ... [5 paragraphs excised] The most important line to note in the UTF-9 internet draft is: INTERNET DRAFT UTF-9 April 1, 2003 'nuff said. --Ken
