From: "Rick McGowan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 6:43 PM Subject: Re: Hebrew composition model, with cantillation marks
> Andrew, There isn't a CJK list. > Rick CJK normalization at least does not cause so many problems, as ideographs are not encoded by combining sequences, but individually (except for some private ideographs that may be encoded with ideographic description characters, and basic radicals or strokes, but they all are base character at class 0 and are not affected by normalization). So the only discussions in CJK are mostly related to unification of repertoires from various sources (national standard organisms, research groups and universitaries, librarians, dictionnaries and their publishers...) This focuses much less a large population, but it is certainly a problem when CJK can be augmented ad infinitum without policies by any one using the script and constantly inventing new characters in their own EUDC area and using them to publish something.
