> However, a couple of paragraphs up, the definition for No-Break > Space says: > > > U+00A0 [No-Break Space] behaves like the following coded > > character sequence: U+FEFF [Zero Width No-Break Space] + > > U+0020 [Space] + U+FEFF [Zero Width No-Break Space]. > > Is this something that has slipped by the editors? Or am I missing > something?
The U+FEFF most certainly should have been replaced by WJ in this paragraph. The text is still correct, as FEFF must forever retain its ZWNBSP semantics for backwards compatibility, but it flies in the face of our attempt to discourage its use in favor of WJ.
A./
