Peter Kirk wrote: > Conclusion: the right thing even for Turkish is to drop the dot on i > before a circumflex.
I agree. The letter is rare enough to not create an exception here for
the removal of dot on the soft-dotted i followed by circumflex (which
is needed much more often in other languages that use 'Ã' and Ã'.
> But by the same argument we would also want to drop
> the dot on dotless I.
I think you meant "But by the same argument we would also want to drop
the dot on DOTTED I". I would not recommand it, this would make things
even worse and more complicated.
If Turkish wants to remove the dot on "pseudo-dotted" I if followed by
a circumflex, the correct thing to do is then to use the ASCII dotless
I and add a circumflex or use its canonical equivalent
<LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH CIRCUMFLEX>.
With the current specification, both of
<LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I, COMBINING CIRCUMFLEX>, and
<LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH CIRCUMFLEX>
are canonical equivalents and must render the same, without the dot.
To display a dot, one can use one of the four canonical eqquivalents:
<LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH DOT ABOVE, COMBINING CIRCUMFLEX>
<LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH CIRCUMFLEX, COMBINING DOT ABOVE>
<LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I, COMBINING DOT ABOVE, COMBINING CIRCUMFLEX>
<LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I, COMBINING CIRCUMFLEX, COMBINING DOT ABOVE>
(one is the NFC form, another is the NFD form, two others are also
possible)
__________________________________________________________________
<< ella for Spam Control >> has removed Spam messages and set aside
Newsletters for me
You can use it too - and it's FREE! http://www.ellaforspam.com
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
