> > WHY THEN DISTRIBUTES THE KLI SUCH A BLATANTLY UNCONFORMANT FONT? > > You could have said that without vociferating so loudly. (Against the > etiquette, no?)
In the KLIpIqaDmey font this indicates using the pIqaD letters. Lower case are the Mandel letters. > What is non conforming? The fact that the font uses PUAs? Rather the fact that it does not.
