On Jan 20, 2004, at 6:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Except that this character is listed in CJK Extension C, on page 612. (File: IRGN9285.PDF 08/06/02)
Irrelevant. Extension C isn't encoded yet. The UTC's intention is that in the future, SC forms derivable algorithmically from their encoded TC counterparts (and vice versa) should be represented with variation selectors. Of course, whether WG2 will go along with this idea is a different matter...
In fact, there are a dozen or thereabouts SC forms in Unicode's proposal for Extension C. Our hope is that these will be encoded using variation selectors.
======== John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage..mac.com/jhjenkins/
