> From: Peter Kirk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >New concept: filenames where the human-readable name is a user > >preference depending on the individual's PUA assignments. > > > Presumably these filenames are intended only for internal use... > >There's progress for you. > > > It is progress when a system does what you want it to do rather than > deciding for you what you ought to be doing. You may not think what Dean > and his colleagues were doing was very sensible, but it obviously made > sense to them, so what was the point of banning it? (sigh) I was not deriding what Dean and his colleagues are doing; I was not trying to ban it. I was just imagining potential implications of using PUA characters for filenames and making a joke. Might we possibly find a sense of humour now? Or is my sense of humour too warped for others' tastes? Peter Peter Constable Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies Microsoft Windows Division
