In my view ano teleia should have the size and position of the upper
dot of the ":" glyph. Am I correct? Alexandros Diamantidis wrote: * Asmus Freytag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-16 11:28]:weight. (See attached sample). If data is normalized, the appearance of ano teleia will change (since 0387 will change into 00B7) and users will be disappointed.Yes, I know - I've seen professionally published magazines with the wrong ano teleia glyph, bigger and lower than it should be. It was probably not even caused by normalization - I think most Greek keyboards produce 00B7 and not 0387.Since language-dependend glyph selection isn't very widespread for now, would it be too much to ask font designers to put a MIDDLE DOT glyph appropriate for Greek in fonts capable of displaying Greek text? That's a just a wish, BTW - I don't expect designers to do what I say just because I sent a message in a mailing list ;-) -- Joop Jagers (Eindhoven, NL) \ \\ // / ( @ @ ) ----oOOO----(_)----OOOo----- |
- Re: U+0140 Catalan mi... Philippe Verdy
- Re: U+0140 Catalan mi... Peter Kirk
- Re: U+0140 Catalan mi... Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin
- Re: U+0140 Catalan mi... Asmus Freytag
- Re: U+0140 Philippe Verdy
- Re: U+0140 Alexandros Diamantidis
- Re: U+0140 Asmus Freytag
- GREEK ANO TELEIA (was: Re... Alexandros Diamantidis
- Re: GREEK ANO TELEIA John Hudson
- Re: GREEK ANO TELEIA Peter Kirk
- Re: GREEK ANO TELEIA Joop Jagers
- Re: GREEK ANO TELEIA John Hudson
- Re: U+0140 Peter Kirk
- Re: U+0140 Elaine Keown
- Re: U+0140 Mark E. Shoulson
- Re: U+0140 Michael Everson
- Re: U+0140 Kenneth Whistler
- Re: U+0140 Mark E. Shoulson
- Re: U+0140 Ernest Cline
- Re: U+0140 Antoine Leca
- Re: U+0140 Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin