> While applications are of course not
> obliged to support the PUA, if they choose to do so there should be no
> expectation that they are party to any agreement. And so a group of
> users with a private agreement can reasonably assume that software
which
> supports the PUA in general supports their particular agreement.

Since there is not and cannot be any common specification for what it
means for an application to support the PUA, no assumptions can be made
by users about what an application does beyond what the application
vendor explicitly commits to. There is no rule anywhere that says that
an application must support whatever their customers might assume about
the PUA. The application vendor itself is a user of the Unicode
Standard, and is free to make it's own private assumptions.

(Of course, it may help their customers if they don't make too many
assumptions.)

 

Peter
 
Peter Constable
Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies
Microsoft Windows Division

Reply via email to