Ernest Cline wrote, > > In order for Phoenician to be "disunified" from Hebrew, it must > > first have been unified with Hebrew. This is not the case. > > Well then, nonunification if you wish to be picky about it.
Sorry if I offended. Many on this list have referred to the current proposal as a "disunification" and seem to be arguing that accepting this proposal would change and disrupt current Unicoding practices. In this case, I think it's important to be picky because there are no current Unicoding practices for Phoenician. Phoenician is not yet encoded in the standard. Best regards, James Kass
