-- Curtis Clark http://www.csupomona.edu/~jcclark/ Mockingbird Font Works http://www.mockfont.com/
It's hard for me to believe that the world community of Semitic scholars
is so small or monolithic that there aren't differences of opinion among
them. I have been almost automatically suspicious of the posts by the
Semiticists opposed to encoding Phoenician; after thirty-four years in
academia (longer if I count that my father was a professor when I was a
youth), I have yet to see a field in which there were not differences of
opinion. Admittedly, all Semiticists might agree on the nature of
Phoenician (just as all chemists accept the periodic table), but the
fervor exhibited here makes me wonder what the issues *really* are. I am
used to seeing such fervor among academics only when there has been some
unstated agenda at work. And so I wonder, are we in this list reading
only one side of an internal squabble among Semiticists?
- Re: Response to Everson Phoenician ... John Hudson
- Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why J... Michael Everson
- Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why J... Ted Hopp
- Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and w... Christopher Fynn
- Re: Response to Everson Phoenician ... Peter Kirk
- Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and w... John Hudson
- Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7? Dean Snyder
- Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7? Peter Kirk
- Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7? Michael Everson
- Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7? Mark E. Shoulson
- Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June ... Curtis Clark
- Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why J... Dean Snyder
- Re: Response to Everson Ph and why Jun 7? ... E. Keown
- Re: Response to Everson Ph and why Jun 7... Michael Everson
- Re: Response to Everson Ph and why ... E. Keown
- Re: Response to Everson Ph and why ... Patrick Durusau
- Re: Response to Everson Ph and why ... E. Keown
- Re: Response to Everson Ph and why ... Mark E. Shoulson
- Re: Response to Everson Ph and why ... Mark Davis
- Re: Response to Everson Ph and why ... E. Keown
- Re: Response to Everson Ph and why ... Mark Davis