> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Edward H. Trager
> > > A better CSS class would additionally specify the font-family, > > > for example, something like the SIL Ezra font > > > > (http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&id=EzraSIL_Hom e) ... > Are you saying the difference in names is "SIL Ezra" vs. "Ezra SIL" ? > That's too confusing! > > When I gave the URL, I checked that it was referring > to an "OpenType" font --and since it was OpenType, I assumed that it was > the > newer version with a Unicode CMAP. If SIL still has links to legacy non- > Unicode > versions of fonts which now also have Unicode versions, then they should > make > this really clear to people. My apologies if I provided the wrong URL. Your URL was to the Unicode-encoded OpenType font. The pages for that font (Ezra SIL) and the legacy-encoded font (SIL Ezra) very clearly indicate which is which. Peter Constable
