From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Dlugosz
>> This last message is certainly more on topic there, it discusses >> existing characters and their usage in some experimental (mostly > I think so too. Then please trim the scope of discussion to discuss *only* those characters, not the merits of hexadecimal systems; and to availability of evidence of attestation of usage in general publications or interchange -- it has been made clear that Unicode will not encode characters for which such adoption is *already established*. So far, there is no indication that the characters in question are attested in anything beyond nonce usage by Nystrom and private usage by individuals. Peter
