Den 2010-07-24 10.07, skrev "Philippe Verdy" <verd...@wanadoo.fr>:
> Double diacritics have a combining property equal to zero, so they
No, they don't. The above ones have combining class 234 and the below
ones have combining class 233 (other characters with the word DOUBLE
in them are 'double' in some other way):
035C;COMBINING DOUBLE BREVE BELOW;Mn;233;NSM;;;;;N;;;;;
035F;COMBINING DOUBLE MACRON BELOW;Mn;233;NSM;;;;;N;;;;;
0362;COMBINING DOUBLE RIGHTWARDS ARROW BELOW;Mn;233;NSM;;;;;N;;;;;
1DFC;COMBINING DOUBLE INVERTED BREVE BELOW;Mn;233;NSM;;;;;N;;;;;
035D;COMBINING DOUBLE BREVE;Mn;234;NSM;;;;;N;;;;;
035E;COMBINING DOUBLE MACRON;Mn;234;NSM;;;;;N;;;;;
0360;COMBINING DOUBLE TILDE;Mn;234;NSM;;;;;N;;;;;
0361;COMBINING DOUBLE INVERTED BREVE;Mn;234;NSM;;;;;N;;;;;
1DCD;COMBINING DOUBLE CIRCUMFLEX ABOVE;Mn;234;NSM;;;;;N;;;;;
So everything you write based on your false premise is unjustified
(and most is false).
> block the reordering for canonical equivalences and the relative order
> and independance for the encoding of base grapheme clusters will be
> preserved during normalizations.
...
...
...
/kent k
