On 28 Jul 2010, at 18:09, Murray Sargent wrote: > Contextual rendering is getting to be more common thanks to adoption of > OpenType features. For example, both MS Publisher 2010 and MS Word 2010 > support various contextually dependent OpenType features at the user's > discretion. The choice of glyph for U+002E could be chosen according to an > OpenType style. > > It's worth remembering that plain text is a format that was introduced due to > the limitations of early computers. Books have always been rendered with at > least some degree of rich text. And due to the complexity of Unicode, even > Unicode plain text often needs to be rendered with more than one font.
Are or will be OT features supported in, say, filenames? Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
