> Does this mean that Tulasi is not at all on the list? I request the > moderator to look into this issue and take appropriate action.
Not moderator! Its Unicode Inc. This inc owns the property unicode.org I think Unicode Inc should disclose what it did in the past to some number of members in this forum behind their back. Your name sounds Indu/Indic. Don't they in India make requested information within 30 days unless the information is a threat to national security? What do you get from Mark Davis here? a probable ans - LOL :) Tulasi From: Shriramana Sharma <[email protected]> Date: Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:06 PM Subject: Re: Mail filtering, and Tulasi - (was) Re: Everson's Ahom proposal To: Asmus Freytag <[email protected]>, Petr Tomasek <[email protected]>, Unicode Mailing List <[email protected]> Does this mean that Tulasi is not at all on the list? I request the moderator to look into this issue and take appropriate action. On 6/26/11, Asmus Freytag <[email protected]> wrote: > On 6/26/2011 3:28 AM, Petr Tomasek wrote: >> >> It seems thus that tulasi had harvested the "emails" he/she found >> within the unicode mailing lists' archive... >> >>> I request people replying to people to verify whether a mail is >>> directed to the list or to them personally. >>> > > > Thanks for alerting me to this. I reviewed the mail headers on messages > I have received from "tulasi" and have found, likewise, that these > messages have reached me directly (that I, via BCC) and not, as the > "from" field suggests, via the list. > > I would consider this practice deceptive. > > Many people send me messages directly as well as via the list. I don't > have problems with that, because these people do this openly, using the > "cc" field. Even if I receive the direct copy first, I know that what I > have received is a copy, and not the message that has gone through the > list (and seen by others). > > When faced with deceptive mailings of any kind, I usually end up finding > a way to rout these into my junk folder in the most expeditiously > possible way. > > I hope everybody knows how to deal with deceptive email. > > A./ > > > -- Shriramana Sharma
