Namely, there are two characters that could be considered candidates: no-vinculum radical symbol and radical extension.
Leo On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Leo Broukhis <l...@mailcom.com> wrote: > In light of W*dings fonts being reviewed as a source of addenda to > Unicode and the reasons for disunification mentioned in N4115, I'd > like to ask if there is anything in the Symbol font that is not yet > adequately represented by encoded characters (to wit: > http://www.numericana.com/about.htm) and that could be added as > separate Unicode codepoints to put the Symbol font issue to rest.