From: unicore-boun...@unicode.org [mailto:unicore-boun...@unicode.org] On Behalf Of Michael Everson
>> Yeah OK maybe simply base+diacritic stuff or even ligatures would be >> easy to do via simple substitution rules in tables, but how about glyph >> reordering? > No problem unless you are using Uniscribe. Which of these are you saying? - That mark positioning and simple substitution rules involving PUA characters is not a problem unless you're using Uniscribe - That glyph re-ordering of PUA characters is not a problem unless you're using Uniscribe (Unless we have a bug I haven't encountered, the first is incorrect. The second suggests that you've missed Sharma's point entirely.) >> Indic scripts involving reordering and split-positioning vowel signs can't >> be handled by placing them in the PUA. > There are other ways of handling such clusters. Oh? You must mean something like ignoring Unicode. If not, please clarify. Peter
