They won't do it. You can be sure of that. -- Doug Ewell • [email protected] Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
-----Original Message----- From: Philippe Verdy <[email protected]> Sender: [email protected] Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 03:13:02 To: Richard Wordingham<[email protected]> Reply-To: [email protected] Cc: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Multiple private agreements 2011/8/24 Richard Wordingham <[email protected]>: >> > On Tuesday, August 23, 2011 10:29:58 PM Philippe Verdy wrote: >> Even the UTC could create its own PUA registry, > > It won't. The best you can hope for is a list of registries. I did not meant as a part of the standard itself, but as a separate subproject (just like there is the CLDR project maintained independantly from the Unicode standard, with its own schedule and own policies) useful for managing encoding proposals during the encoding process. Like other registries, it vould be coordinated only between participants of this process, discussing together about which part of the registry will be modified or withdrawn, and when this will occur. Such registry (with its own versioning system) does not even have to give any stability policy (not even a limited upward compatibility of versions).
