> It would have the advantage of suppressing those names from the > proposed table for UTR #25 (characters used in Mathematical > notations). > > In the merged name aliases table, we could as well include : > - SGML/HTML/XML character entity names (and some standardized synonyms) ?
HTML character entity names would be nice to have, but it would rather make sense to have them in a separate file. > - Postscript names (from AGL), also used in the "name" table of > TrueType/OpenType fonts > - possibly even their Postscript numeric id's (the 256 first names > from the AGL list is not even stored in fonts, where they are bound > only by string id). I don't see why these should go into the unicode tables... > - other names from candidate standards ? What I'm really missing is the "filename" of the latest ("authoritative") proposal appropriate for the character. I think even that unicode should publish officially and for the broader these proposal as they are very good starting point for people who wish to learn more about particular codepoint / script. > -- Philippe. -- Petr Tomasek <http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~tomasek> Jabber: but...@jabbim.cz ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ EA 355:001 DU DU DU DU EA 355:002 TU TU TU TU EA 355:003 NU NU NU NU NU NU NU EA 355:004 NA NA NA NA NA ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~