2011/9/14 Kent Karlsson <kent.karlsso...@telia.com>: >> And how will you define what is an "implicit" LDM ? For example "1.2" > > Did you actually READ my submission re. the PRI? Seems like not. There is a > suggestion there (which requires a bit of character contextual processing). > It is also possible to use a different analysis for special cases, e.g. > domain names or URLs (if detectable somehow, e.g. via markup).
Yes I have read it, and I'm convinced this will not work. It breaks the UBA in a non-conforming and incompatible way. I'm now sure that LDM is not even needed if the UBA is implemented correctly.
