> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:35:39 +0200 > From: Simon Montagu <smont...@smontagu.org> > CC: unicode@unicode.org > > Sorry, I think I confused you here. I quoted the expected rendering in > ASCII digits, but the testcase in fact uses Arabic-Indic digits.
There's no difference in rendering of ASCII digits in this particular use case. However, it could be that the confusion is mine, and it stems from the fact that the logical order of these characters was not stated by the OP. Is it 1999/12/31 or 31/12/1999 ?
