On 11/22/2011 1:22 PM, Jeremie Hornus wrote:
Wouldn't be "Unicode Character Glyph Description" more accurate than
"Unicode Character Name" ?
And just "Unicode Character Description" for those pointing to no glyph.
These are "names" in the sense of an ID. That they are created by
deriving them from a description of the characters appearance in many
cases does not alter that fact.
A./
J.
On 22 Nov 2011, at 20:35, Asmus Freytag wrote:
On 11/22/2011 11:02 AM, a...@peoplestring.com
<mailto:a...@peoplestring.com> wrote:
Hi!
In one of the discussions in this community, it was stated that once
assigned, the name of a character cannot be changed. But I have noticed
some characters have their name changed eg 'ARABIC LETTER YEH BARREE'
(U+06D2) was previously named 'ARABIC LETTER YA BARREE'. Could anyone
please clarify me on this?
Unicode 1.0 was merged with an ISO draft into a joint character
encoding. In this process, different naming conventions got
rationalized, and some other changes were made to make this merged
standard possible.
You will find that all policies that prevent certain changes have a
well-defined starting version. No changes are allowed for any new
version, but sometimes, certain changes were made in early versions.
See: http://www.unicode.org/policies/stability_policy.html
For names, this document states:
*Name Stability*
/*Applicable Version: Unicode 2.0+*/
The Unicode Name property value for any non-reserved code point
will not be changed. In particular, once a character is encoded,
its name will not be changed.
As you can see, Unicode 1.0 names are explicitly not covered.
A./
