On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 19:09, Michael Everson wrote: >No, because both the combining-a and the combining-diaeresis are bound to the >base letter; the combining diaeresis is not bound to the combining-a.
Just like the proposed U+1ABB COMBINING PARENTHESIS ABOVE will be bound to the base letter, not the combining mark that it's parenthesizing. Oops. —Ben Scarborough
