2012-04-26 14:57, Michael Everson wrote:
On 26 Apr 2012, at 12:25, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
A quick testing shows that this can indeed be a big problem. Say, U+1D400
U+0301 looks very bad if both characters are from Cambria Math; rather bad when
they are from Code2001.
𝐀́ It looks OK in Everson Mono. :-)
Certainly better than in the fonts I mentioned, but not quite OK: the
acute should not touch the base letter.
It seems that that the diacritic is placed in a fixed vertical position
independently of the base letter. For Everson Mono, with a large
x-height, with the position of the acute set accordingly, and with
U+1D400 being not much taller than normal “a”, the placement is better
than with other fonts.
With U+1D468 for example, Everson Mono fails, too: 𝑨́.
Yucca
