On 5/22/2012 2:23 AM, Michael Everson wrote:
On 22 May 2012, at 08:11, Andreas Stötzner wrote:
Am 22.05.2012 um 00:22 schrieb Michael Everson:
If Greece ceases to use the euro and uses the drachma instead, and if they 
create any kind of symbol for it, I think whatever glyph is devised will be 
applied to the existing character.
This is exactly what should be done with the Turkish Lira.
No, because the existing character could be or could have been used for other 
liras.


Correct. And as for the other characters mentioned, the case is not so different - they could be or could have been used for some other purpose. Neither Unicode nor 10646 controls in any way how characters are used. Instead, there's the express guarantee: characters will not change. So if you found that some existing character serves a particular purpose, be it in designating a currency or in some other notation, you are guaranteed that the character is stable - your documents will not be corrupted just because some experts or other at some future committee meeting decide that they know what the character "should have been used for".

A./

Reply via email to