On Wed, 23 May 2012 17:47:09 -0700 Markus Scherer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Richard Wordingham < > [email protected]> wrote: > The order of code points and contractions as listed in > FractionalUCA.txt and allkeys.txt should be the same, except for > intended differences. So if you remove comments and anything after a > semicolon and ignore white space, then a simple file diff should show > the ordering differences. That shouldn't be expected to pick up a change to make 006C+00B7 collate like 006C 02B2! (It may, because the notation used is different, and I think this does affect the arrangement of the data.) I think it also wouldn't pick up a correction of U+A7F8 from plain superscript to uppercase superscript, though that would only change a parametrically tailored collation - and that's a type of change I'd overlooked. > Also, I just saw that > http://www.unicode.org/Public/UCA/latest/CollationAuxiliary.zipcontains > allkeys_CLDR.txt which should correspond 1:1 with the > FractionalUCA*.txt in the same .zip file. allkeys_CLDR.txt only shows casing if it truly derives from the tertiary weight, and from the tertiary weight alone. Richard.
