Check the tr38 <http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr38/tr38-12.html>, from the
description of kTotalStrokes, it provides stroke count data for simplified
Chinese and traditional Chinese.
Then, I don't have concern.

Thanks!
Claire.

On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Claire Ho (賀靜蘭) <clair...@google.com> wrote:

> Hi Mark
>
> > There you find the line:
>
> > U+8303 kTotalStrokes 8
>
> In Traditional Chinese, U+8303 has 9 strokes as Matt mentioned in the
> email.
>
> The radical "++" is counted as 4 strokes. I think there are several
> radicals have the same issue, different stroke counts, between simplified
> Chinese and traditional Chinese.
>
> Claire.
>
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Mark Davis ☕ <m...@macchiato.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Matt Ma <matt.ma.um...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have two questions regarding the collation sequence defined in
>>> zh.xml, CLDR 21.0
>>>
>>> 1. Why is U+8303 (范)  counted as 9 strokes instead of 8 for <collation
>>> type="stroke">? As a reference, U+59DA (姚) is counted as 9 strokes but
>>> sorted before U+8303 (范).
>>>
>>
>> CLDR now gets the stroke collation data from the kTotalStokes property.
>> The values for that are in the file Unihan/Unihan_DictionaryLikeData.txt in
>> the Unicode Character Database.
>>
>> There you find the line:
>>
>> U+8303 kTotalStrokes 8
>>
>> If that is in error, or if there is any other error in the kTotalStrokes
>> data, then please report the correct value according to
>> http://www.unicode.org/review/pri230/ so that it can be fixed.
>> As a related matter, CLDR now gets the pinyin collation data from
>> the kMandarin property. The values for that are in the
>> file Unihan/Unihan_Readings.txt in the Unicode Character Database. So if
>> any of those are in error, they should also be reported as per
>> http://www.unicode.org/review/pri230/ .
>>
>> The beta data is in ftp://www.unicode.org/Public/6.2.0/ucd/. Currently
>> in ftp://www.unicode.org/Public/6.2.0/ucd/Unihan-6.2.0d1.zip
>> but as the beta proceeds, the d1 might change to d2,d3...
>>
>>
>>>
>>> 2. Does the collation type, stroke, apply to both Simplified and
>>> Traditional Chinese, as I do not see anything defined in zh_Hant.xml
>>> under "stroke"?
>>>
>>
>> Let me look at that.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Matt
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to