On 6/20/2012 8:09 PM, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Ken Whistler<k...@sybase.com> wrote:
I don't see any necessary correlation between what sequences
people might end up insisting on naming (for whatever reason) and what
people might consider to be "graphemes".
I submit that the following sequence shall be allotted named sequence status:
\u0053\u0048\u0052\u0049\u0052\u0041\u004D\u0041\u004E\u0041
;-)
But the point is not just the sequence, but also the name for it. What
do you propose?
A./
