Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org> wrote: |> For example, this mail is |> written in an UTF-8 enabled vi(1) basically from 1986, in UTF-8 |> encoding («Schöne Überraschung, gelle?» | |No, it isn't: | | Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Oh, it's really terrible. I do have 'reply-in-same-charset' set, so as to not trouble people with less sophisticated mailers, and it seems the mailer maybe ignores the 'sendcharsets=utf-8' if the same-charset ISO-8859-1 is sufficient to represent the content! What a considerate mailer! So, for you 41744 S+ 0.0 1288 ttys004 9:29pm 0:00.06 nail -f & 41753 S+ 0.0 756.)ttys004 9:35pm 0:00.03 vi -c set sw=2 /tmp/RepfAbEB and righteousness, this time without reply-in-same-charset and encoding=8bit and i bet it comes out as UTF-8 on the other end: «Böses Erwachen folgte pünktlich, prompt und ohne Verzögerung.» (And, just in case -- the Google translation is a bit too rude.) Steven
