On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 19:57:02 +0100 Michael Everson <[email protected]> wrote:
> But there is no reason to rush forward encoding a tiny subset of an > important and complex script on some assumption that those characters > don't interact with other characters in the script in a meaningful > way. That is asking for trouble in encoding. On the other hand, I think many of us would be a lot happier if the cuneiform numerals in modern use had been encoded first! Richard.
