First of all, thanks for all the answers. It's quite interesting for me to learn, that data here is such fragmented. As calligrapher, who once was delighted to learn about the Latf script tag in the context of RFC 5646 et al., I guess I was way too naive when starting the scripts part of codepoints.net.
@Doug Ewell: Yes, I wondered, why that was added to Unicode, when I read about Shavian first (in the context of Unicode codepoints). @Asmus Freytag: Thanks for the pointer! It seems however to become a completely new and open-ended project to collect that data. Anyway it goes way beyond the scope I planned for codepoints.net, where the focus lies on individual codepoints, and I wanted to give a convenient way to find those "on the globe". My next step will be presumably, to focus on ISO 15924 scripts and there the ones actually used in Unicode. When I can get that into a reasonable shape (in reasonable time) without digging through mountains of data, it would suffice for codepoints.net. Apart from that collecting the data about scripts in use seems still to be an interesting topic. I'll think about a way to collect, present and maintain such a database. Cheers, Manuel
