Do you realize the operating cost of any international standard comittee or for the maintenance ans securization of an international registry ? Who will pay ? You ? Unless there's a very productive and demonstrate need of such a registry, using the existing domain name or URI schemes mechanism will be enough.
2013/4/23 William_J_G Overington <wjgo_10...@btinternet.com> > On Tuesday 23 April 2013, Philippe Verdy <verd...@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > > > There's also noather issue: your proposal now uses identifiers that will > be resolved in a registry database you are the only one to control. > > Not at all. The registry would be controlled by an International Standards > Organization committee. > > As you have raised the matter, here is a quote from a document that I > submitted to the ISO/IEC 10646 committee in January 2012. > > quote > > My current thinking is that an ISO committee entity would choose sentences > and symbols and then approach the ISO/IEC 10646 committee on an > inter-committee liaison basis to ask for character code points to be > assigned to the symbol and sentence pairs. For the avoidance of doubt I > have, as at the time of preparing this document, made no application to ISO > about such a committee entity carrying out such activities. > > My thinking is that that ISO committee entity could potentially be one of > the following. > > 1. A new ISO committee, generated for the purpose. > > 2. The ISO/IEC 10646 committee, or a subcommittee of the ISO/IEC 10646 > committee. > > 3. An existing ISO committee, other than the ISO 10646 committee, or a > subcommittee of that committee. > > end quote > > William Overington > > 23 April 2013 > >
