2013/5/17 William_J_G Overington <[email protected]> > > I am thinking of suggesting the following. > > Keep LATIN LETTER N WITH CEDILLA and LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH CEDILLA as > they are now, with the comma in the glyph. > > Encode two new precomposed characters LATIN LETTER N WITH REAL CEDILLA and > LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH REAL CEDILLA for use in Marshallese. > > In order to minimize confusion there could be a reference in the code > chart under the existing characters that these are not the characters > needed for Marshallese and referring readers to LATIN LETTER N WITH REAL > CEDILLA and LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH REAL CEDILLA. >
Instead of "REAL" I suggest "ATTACHED" which is more descriptive and matches the term used when describing the combining classes. Also I suggest an informative note saying that the existing characters with cedillas may be alternatively named "WITH COMMA BELOW" saying that their representation with the unattached glyph is also valid (and for other languages using these characters, this dictinction of glyphs is not really important, so the best representative glyphs should use a detached comma below, independantly of the normative character names).
