> The text in question is not exactly new to Unicode 6.2, probably goes > back to around the time > UTF-8 and UTF-16 were added over a decade ago. Getting a single question > on this passage after all these years would seem to indicate that > confusion isn't exactly rampant.
Just to address the textual question: TUS 4.0 Section 2.5, p. 28. So it was language added in 2003, 10 years ago. --Ken
