On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 00:50:45 +0100, Richard Wordingham 
<richard.wording...@ntlworld.com> wrote:

I don't like the idea, but one possibility would be to define Serbian glyph 
styles by adding variation selectors.  Variation selectors are already 
'defined' for the decimal digits U+0030 to U+0039.  It would, however, mess up 
string comparison operations that weren't smart enough to ignore variation 
selectors.

Also, for the variation selectors to work for the end user, it requires the 
same technologies whose lack of support is why we are discussing this in the 
first place, doesn’t it? So, defining the corresponding variation selectors 
would not make the end user see the correct glyphs earlier.
_______________________________________________
Unicode mailing list
Unicode@unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode

Reply via email to