Mr. Cook, Thank you for all the information (and bringin Wenlin to my attention as well).
> Where a specific value attested in a specific Kangxi edition is missing from > kRSUnicode, it would indeed be useful to add it, Great to hear that. > Since kRSUnicode is a Normative property, a formal proposal to modify that > data is required, for review in WG2. I have added notes on the items you > mention below, for consideration in that process, and in the meantime, if you > identify any other issues, please bring them to our attention. OK, I will prepare a more comprehensive list. Do you mean that you would submit such a formal proposal? Or can I submit it myself somehow? > PS: About the subject line of your message. Yes, of course, the subject should have read "CJK radical-stroke count data". Not one of my brightest moments, I guess... -- Adam Nohejl _______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list Unicode@unicode.org http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
