Le 16/03/14 08:15, David Starner a écrit :
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Naena Guru <naenag...@gmail.com> wrote:
I made a presentation demonstrating Dual-script Singhala at National
Science
Foundation of Sri Lanka. Most of the attendees were government
employees and
media representatives; a few private citizens came too.
I don't know what the point was of sending this message. You claim
that Unicode Sinhala was outside the subject matter of the
presentation, so why would you post it to this list?
I think the point is in the survey : the questionned persons would have
answered:
-- that they believe that Dual-script Singhala is convenient to them,
-- that Unicode Sinhala isn't easy and/or has problems,
-- that the cost of Unicode Sinhala should be eliminated by switching to
Dual-scrip Singhala
-- and that they should focus on making this "easy-to-use" Dual-script
Singhala method a standard.
The big question is what is difficult in Unicode Sinhala. Is there
anything Unicode could do to change that feeling?
What's precisely the cost of Unicode Sinhala? Does its use require a
teaching period the hack wouldn't need? Why?
Le 16/03/14 08:15, David Starner a écrit :
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Naena Guru <naenag...@gmail.com> wrote:
I made a presentation demonstrating Dual-script Singhala at National Science
Foundation of Sri Lanka. Most of the attendees were government employees and
media representatives; a few private citizens came too.
I don't know what the point was of sending this message. You claim
that Unicode Sinhala was outside the subject matter of the
presentation, so why would you post it to this list?
_______________________________________________
Unicode mailing list
Unicode@unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
