We try not to do that. There are some known holes, like RBNF. if you know of others please file a ticket.
{phone} On Apr 21, 2014 9:18 PM, "Doug Ewell" <d...@ewellic.org> wrote: > From: Asmus Freytag <asmusf at ix dot netcom dot com> wrote: > > > In general, I heartily dislike "specifications" that just narrate a > > particular implementation... > > I agree completely. I see this with CLDR as well; there is a more or > less implicit assumption that I will be using ICU to implement whatever > is being described. I don't care how robust and well-tested a wheel is; > as a developer, I should be able to use the specification to reinvent it > if I like. > > -- > Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, USA > http://ewellic.org | @DougEwell > > > _______________________________________________ > Unicode mailing list > Unicode@unicode.org > http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode >
_______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list Unicode@unicode.org http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode