Michael, > "Declines to take action” is pretty thin.
A proposal which is declined by the UTC doesn't automatically create an obligation to write an extended dissertation explaining the rationale and putting that rationale on record. It might be one thing if there were a lot of controversy involved, and one group of participants asked for a rationale to be recorded, despite not having a consensus to move on something -- but this one wasn't even close. Nobody in the committee felt encoding was justified in this case. And not every mark on paper -- not even every mark *printed* in typeset material on paper -- is automatically an obvious candidate for encoding with a simple, plain text character representation. --Ken _______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list Unicode@unicode.org http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
