On Sun, 4 Jan 2015 01:29:05 +0000 Richard Wordingham <[email protected]> wrote:
> Similarly, there is nothing in TUS itself to specify whether /kuː/ > (Lao /kʰuː/) 'pair' is spelt <U+1A23 TAI THAM LETTER LOW KA, U+1A6A > TAI THAM VOWEL SIGN UU, 1A76 TAI THAM SIGN TONE-2> or <U+1A23, U+1A76, > U+1A6A>. Unlike Thai, these two sequences are not canonically > equivalent. Correction: Read U+1A75 TAI THAM SIGN TONE-1 for U+1A76 in both locations. _______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list [email protected] http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
