On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 23:26:09 -0700 Karl Williamson <[email protected]> wrote:
> But the earlier rule, WB6 > > (ALetter | Hebrew_Letter) × (MidLetter | MidNumLet > | Single_Quote) (ALetter | Hebrew_Letter) > > seems to me to say (among other things) that a Hebrew Letter followed > by a Single Quote shouldn't break if and only if the latter is also > followed by either an ALetter or another Hebrew Letter (again modulo > ignored Format and Extend letters) > > This seems contradictory. One rule says something unconditionally, > and the other rule adds conditions. There's no 'only if'. WB6 applies to 6 combinations, one of which is redundant because of WB7A. Removing the redundant condition would require an additional rule. Richard. _______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list [email protected] http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
