> On 13 Apr 2015, at 23:18, Garth Wallace <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm much further along on my research for a proposal to encode > heterodox chess symbols. I asked about terms for rotations last > November and was told that the terms in use in the standard are > CLOCKWISE-ROTATED and ANTICLOCKWISE-ROTATED (e.g. U+29BC), but I > wasn't sure I would be proposing the knights in intermediate 45 degree > rotations. Now I believe I have sufficient evidence for their use in > running text, which brings up the question of how to name them. In my > current draft I'm using terms like BLACK 45 DEGREE CLOCKWISE-ROTATED > CHESS KNIGHT and WHITE 135 DEGREE ANTICLOCKWISE-ROTATED CHESS KNIGHT > for them. It seems awkward, but I can't think of any better naming > convention.
Have you checked if they are here: http://www.chessvariants.org/index/mainquery.php?type=Piececlopedia&orderby=LinkText&displayauthor=1&displayinventor=1&usethisheading=Piececlopedia
