David Starner wrote:
I would say that a system would conform with Unicode in having yellow
heart red (in a non-monochrome font) as well as if it made it a cross.
Either way it's violating character identity. I'd say that being
monochromatic is now like being monospaced; it's suboptimal for a
Unicode implementation, but hardly something Unicode can condemn as
nonconformant.
This seems fair and sensible. My main point was that being monochromatic
(i.e. black) is conformant, and was an attempt to challenge the
statement about character color "sometimes being a recorded property." I
don't see any Unicode character properties that identify color, only
character names, which don't carry property information.
--
Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸
