I did wonder if part of the idea was to get consonant + pulli accepted as basic.
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 21:08:09 +0200 Philippe Verdy <[email protected]> wrote: > Also it's cleanrly not needed to duplicate Latin letters (or Cyrillic > tool) to borrow them in them Tamil script, just in order to add Tamil > vowel diacritics on top of them. Actually, this touches on a very real issue. U+0BC0 TAMIL VOWEL SIGN II has a script property of Tamil, and there is a very strong tendency for <U+006D LATIN SMALL LETTER M, U+0BC0> to be split between two script runs and consequently to be rendered as containing a defective sequence - the cursed dotted circle of the literal grammar police appears. I confirmed this in LibreOffice using the Code2000 font, which I know supports Tamil. Richard.
